Philosophy in the Middle Ages
By Lukas Kern Korn (mka John L. Kelly)
Introduction
Philosophy was known to all of noble birth,
as most of the knowledge of the time came from philosophy. Philosophy is the
mother of all sciences, but to prove this point one must leave the Middle Ages.
Aristotle's lecture notes, when complied, were called "Physics," and the parts
that came after these works was called "Metaphysics," after/beyond physics.
Isaac Newton (long after the middle ages) was known as a "Natural Philosopher,"
and there are numerous other examples. The most modern
science to come from philosophy is psychology,
and others will follow.
The Origin of Philosophy
Philosophy started in Miletus, located on the
Ionian seacoast, the modern country of Turkey. The people of this area had
become wealth traders and so lived a life of luxury. There was time to sit down
and think. They were concerned with the "stuff" (Urstoff) or ultimate matter of
the world. Since they were all materialistic, they are also called the first
"materialists."
Milesians (Ionians)
Thales (624-546 B.C.) was the first
philosopher. He believed water is the ultimate reality from which all things
come and out of which they are made. Things are formed by the process of
"rarefaction" (air, clouds, etc.) or "condensation" (earth, stones, etc.). All
things are alive (hylozoism), i.e., they are "divine" or "full of gods" and have
their own principles of motion and move themselves unless hindered by something
else.
Anaximander (610-545 B.C.) was the student of
Thales. Anaximander surpasses his teacher by explaining how things originate
from the "prime substance." He agreed there is a primary substance, but it is
not water. Water is merely an element of what is yet more primary. The prime
matter is the "Unlimited" or "Indefinite Boundless" From this "boundless" comes
all things. From the "boundless" ( a "vortex" or "seed") comes all things.
Things "separated off" from the vortex to form "the opposites" (hot-cold,
dry-moist, earth-air, day-night, etc.). This "separating off" destroyed the
original unity of the seed, but formed the physical world as we know it with
heaven above and earth below. Living things come from "the moist," from the sea,
with each organism adapting to its environment for survival. By this adaptation
they evolved into higher animals. Man finally came from the highest of these.
Reality is the "dynamic strife of the opposites." As soon as one force get out
of balance, its opposite comes into action. "Justice" determines the order of
the appearance of the opposites and "Time" controls the duration of their
presence(e.g., three months of Summer are balanced by three months of Winter,
day by night, war by peace, etc.).
Anaximenes(585-528 B.C.) was an associate of
Anaximander and the last of the Milesians. Surpasses Anaximenes by explaining
the process of change. "Air" is the primary substance - more definable than
"Boundless" yet more infinite than "Water." Air becomes other things by
condensation and rarefaction. From the "most rare" (least air) to the "most
dense": fire, winds, clouds, air, water earth, stone. Air can change states
because it is divine, i.e., it is alive and has an inherent principle of change.
Change is by condensation and rarefaction.
The Pythagoreans
The Pythagoreans were a religious community
founded on the island of Samos. They believed in "transmigration"
(reincarnation) of the soul, and they were devoted to purification of the soul.
They followed strict rule of discipline and were vegetarians.
Pythagoras (the man) added the idea of
"form" or "limit" to the unlimited prime matter of the Milesians. This form can
be seen in music where "harmony" (form) puts limits on the infinitely possible
sounds. Pythagoras believed the universe was harmony by virtue of Form, and the
attentitave ear can hear the "harmony of the spheres." The Form can be conceived
in mathematical terms: Math is reality and not just a way of understanding
reality. We see that numbers constitute all things: 1 = point, 2 = line, 3 =
plane, 4 = solid and 10 is the sum of all possible reality, and 10 is perfection
(this is why our number system is based on ten). The limited Cosmos (earth) is
surrounded by the Unlimited Cosmos (air) which the former inhaled and gives
meaning to. The whole universe revolves around the "hearth of the universe"
which is "The One" (God, or the focal point of reality), which gives Form to the
Unlimited. Thus the One is seen as a great mathematician who limits or orders
the unlimited according to number. Pythagoras developed many of our current math
notions: odd and even numbers, rational and irrational numbers, square and cube
numbers and roots, Pythagoreans Theorem, etc. Pythagoras was a tremendous
influence on Plato and later philosophy.
Heraclitus
Heraclitus shifts the focus from unity
(being) to change (Becoming). For Heraclitus everything is in a state of "flux"
(change). Permanent primary substance does not exist, and all reality is
mutable. This means that nothing ever is but is always becoming. Change is the
natural order of things. Cosmic Motion is the originator of reality and takes
the form of fire - always changing but keeping it's identity. Fire is all things
that are, the constant tension of consuming and rekindling. Heraclitus proposes
"Nature Law" which governed the constant change: Law, Reason, or Logos controls
all change; the Fiery Principle is Reason. In line with Reason, the fire gives
as much as it takes and the aggregate quantity of all things remains always the
same - the balance of opposites is constant. Heraclitus concludes by saying
man's soul is akin to Reason and functions properly by being rational. The
happiest life is the sober life (Drunkenness is the wetness of the soul)
directed by Reason. The soul is imprisoned in the body during this life and
returns to Reason after death.
The Eleatis
This school of philosophy on Elea in
southern Italy concentrated on the unchanging opposed to the changing, what is
rather than what changes. Paramenides is noted as the leading philosopher of
this school.
Paramenides makes a distinction between the
Two Ways of Knowledge. The first is the Way of Opinion, which is made by use of
the sense, which can be decided (as when we see the stick in water as bent when
it is really straight). The other is the Way of Truth, this kind of knowledge is
reached by reason (understanding that when we that light is refracted by water).
Zeno makes a proof of Paramenides's ideas in
the form of an unsolvable paradox: "Being (as opposed to Nothing or Not-being)
can be spoken of and can be object of thought. That which can be spoken of and
can be thought of can be, i.e., can have being. But, if it can be, then it must
be, and it is. For if it could be and were not then it would be nothing. But
"nothing" cannot be the object of thought or speech, since to think or speak
about nothing is not to think or speak at all. Besides, if it only could be then
it could never come to be for it would have to come out of nothing, yet from
nothing comes nothing. Therefor, if it is then it is, if it is not then it
cannot be. It simply is. And It is Being. "Being" is the only reality.
"Becoming" (change, coming to be and passing away) cannot be and is simply an
illusion. Illusions are the result of the Way of Opinion, and are not seeing
things as they really are by the Way of Truth. Again, if something is to "come
into being" then it must come either out of being or out of not-being(nothing).
But if it comes out of being then it already is. And if it comes out of
not-being then not-being must be something or a thing could not come out of it
(or else not-being would be being with is contradictory). Being, therefor,
cannot come out of being or out of not-being. It (Being) never "came into being"
but simply is, always was, and always will be. Being is uncreated,
indestructible, indivisible, complete, and without end. Being simply is. There
is nothing else. All else is illusion.
The other philosopher of this school is
Zeno. Zeno was a student and defender of Parmenides. He created many paradoxs
showing how Pluralism (reality made-up of units), space, and movement is
impossible. All of this was to prove the ideas of Paramenides ideas were
correct.
Metaphysical Pluralist
Empedocles agrees with Parmenides that
ultimate reality is unchanging, but also realizes that change is a fact that
cannot be denied. Empedocles's reconciliation involved two principles: 1:
objects as wholes do not change, but do come to be and pass away. 2: objects are
composed of particles which do not change and are indestructible. Primary
substances do not change, though they may mingle at different times in different
ways to form different things. The unchanging elements are earth, air, fire and
water. The world is cyclical, or circular in its phases. In the primary phase,
"Love" is the governing principle and all the elements are mixed together to
form concrete things as we know them. "Hate" however is "round about the sphere"
and when it penetrates the sphere the process of separation is begun. Hate
reigns supreme when all the elements are separated and in isolation. Love, drive
out of the sphere, rebuilds it's strength and begins to rejoin the elements in
harmony. This cycle is forever repeated. Love and Hate are material forces, and
both are presently at work in the world as we know it, as we are now about half
way toward sepaearion. The soul is material and lives forever, but in different
forms at different times.
The Atomist logically developed from
Empedocles, but without the mythological forces of love and hate. Rather the
elements are an infinite number of particles or indivisible units called
"atoms." These particles are too small to be perceived. They differ in size and
shape, though they have no qualities other that size and shape and solidity and
impenetrability. No outside forces are needed. The atoms and their movement are
self-subsufficient. Thus, the atoms are Parmenidean, while the things come by
collisions are Heraclitean.
The Sophist (meaning false knowledge.
The same as in Sophomore: false wisdom)
The Sophist of Ancient Greece de-evolved
into the lawyers of today. They tought, for a price, that you could not know
anything and how to argue a case. In fact a young man made a deal with one of
the Sophist who said he could teach people how to always win an argument, "If
you teach me and I win my first case, you will get all the money I earn from
that case." The Sophist feeling confident made the young man his student. After
his education was completed, the young man said he would never take a case and
the old Sophist took him to court and end up in a paradox. If the Sophist won
then the young man would lose the first case and not owe the Sophist anything.
If the young man won then the judge would say the young man owned nothing. This
is the logic in which Sophist worked and made money with.
There were two great teachers among the
Sophists. Protagoras who said, "Man is the measure of all." This meant that
truth depends on man's point of view. The other was Gorgeous who said, "We can't
understand anything and if we could we couldn't communicate it any why." These
two great men made the way for lawyers the gain the power they have today.
Socrates - 399 B.C.
Socrates was known by the Sophist as the
gadfly. The reason for this is that he went around showing the Sophist to be
idiots. Socrates invented a way to find truth, espelly ethical truth. This
process, called the Socratic Method or Socratic dialectic, followed the pattern
of Greek Tragedy.
1: The Birth of the idea(hero)
2: Struggle of the idea(hero) with
reason(conflict)
3: Death of the idea(hero)
4: Rebirth of the idea(hero)
The process was repeated until the idea was
not destroyed by reason. When this happened, Socrates knew it was true. This
inductive method was used by Socrates to find universal definitions in ethics.
Socrates was put to death by the Sophist for
teaching the young people his method and say the Sophists were wrong. He was
arrested on the charge of corrupting the youth, and imprisoned with an unlocked
cell (they hoped he would go into exile so they could discredit him). At the
dawn of the next day he was given a cup with poison in it, he drank it, and
died.
Copyright 1999-2001, John L. Kelly. All Rights Reserved.
This article may be reprinted in your local SCA newsletter as long as you reprint it in it's entirety, credit the author, and send the author a copy of the printed document in which their article was reprinted. Email the Web Minister for more information.